D-GB66 FUEL DISPENSER

D-GB66 FUEL DISPENSER

Pump Type :Optional

Inlet Pressure :>=54kPa.

Flow rate (L/min.): 55±5

Suction Distance (m): 6(verticalmente) / 50(orizzontalmente)

FlowMeter Type : Optional

Accuracy :±0.2%

Motor Voltage(V) :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Capacity(hp) 1HP(0.75kw)

Input Voltage :110V/220V/380V,50Hz/60Hz

Nozzle : Auto Shut-off Nozzle

Environmental Condition :-40~~+55degree

Control Type : Solenold Vale Control Type

Preset :Function Provided(Small LCDIndicator)

Display(Counter): Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount : 0~~999,999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~9999(4 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range :0~~99,999,999,99

Optional Display :Type LCD and Bright Backlight

Digit of Volume : 0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Amount :0~~99,999,999(8 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Unit price : 0~~999999(6 Digits),Decimal point can be changed

Digit of Total Range : 0~~99,999,999,99

Totalizer :1~~9,999,999

Hose :4.5m

Weight :405kg

Dimension(L×W×H) :1270 x 620 x 2420(mm)

Dimension(L×W×H)Of Qty of Container : 40ft: 28 20ft: 13

ping a little oil flow out of corrugated pipe, put a container und fuel dispenser er it. The method is suggested to be applicable to other maintenance of hydraulic com fuel dispenser ponents. Article VI Solenoid valve In this Article a switch, controlled by electric components, is installed at inlet or outlet of measurement transducer, which is used for ensure the accuracy of presetting filling volume of fuel dispenser. Nozzle cannot be closed after finishing presetting fuel dispenser volume due to the inertia of pump and pressured oil, which results in that real volume exceed presetting volume so as to affect fuel dispenser’s accuracy. In order to prevent this phenomenon occurring, most of manufacturers of fuel dispenser adopt to mount a solenoid valve at inlet or outlet of measurement transducer, switching off valve prior to presetting volume getting reach through regulating appropriate ahead volume. The method is one of the most efficient measures that used for ensuring fuel dispenser’s accuracy and preventing overrun resulted from the inertia of pump and pressure oil. There are two kinds of solenoid vale --- membrane type and piston type. The former, simple structure and high anti—pollution, is closed through membrane. However, its performance is depended upon the technology about membrane and weather. The latter valve controlled through piston has wide applicable range of temperature, weak to anti-jammed pollution. Double flux solenoid valve is controlled by the position movement of cam that is driven by motor, and large or small flux is realized through the open or closed of main or vice valve. It has merits of wide applicable temperature range, high pollution-resistant. At present, most manufacturers adopt double flux membrane solenoid valve in fuel dispenser. Double flux solenoid valve Structure and working principle Membrane solenoid valve is widely adopted recently, which also called double flux solenoid valve, shown in Diagram 2-35 and 2-36. Diagram 2-35: Working principle of double flux solenoid valve Diagram 2-36:

shops the evaluation of　　conditions considerably influenced the fuel dispenser work　　 non-electrical ignit fuel dispenser ion sources (mainly me-　　of the Explosion Protection of Electrical Equip-　　 chanical and electrostatic) was discussed in　　ment Department (3.4) and especially of the　　 detail. In add fuel dispenser ition assistance was given at a　　Fundamentals of Physical Safety Technology　　 special event (176th PTB Seminar Explosion-　　Department (3.3) as the non-electrical (me-　　 protected non-electrical equipment Euro-　　chanical) explosion-protected equipment　　 pean Directives ) to manufacturers of explo-　　newly covered by the two Directives comes　　 sion-protected equipment trade supervisory　　within the field of work of these two depart-　　 authorities and trade associations. To assist　　 manufacturers of explosion-protected equip-　　 ment in the assessment of their devices the　　 workshops also served to further develop the　　Cover picture　　 method for ignition source assessment in　　Representation of the frequency-dependent cur-　　 cooperation with the manufacturers. These　　rent density and field distribution in the stator and　　 methods which then were presented at sev-　　rotor core of a c

France digests the events of the past two months, what lessons wi fuel dispenser ll it draw? Already, some are wondering if the country will ever be able to reform. S fuel dispenser uccessive governments have given in to mass street protests; in 1986, in 1994, in 1995, and now in 2006. If a relatively limited liberalisation of part of the labour code provokes such resistance, goes this line, what hope is there of bolder change? That question especially bothers Nicolas Sar fuel dispenser kozy, the interior minister and front-running centre-right presidential hopeful. This week, he repeated his call for a “rupture�with the past, arguing in an interview with Le Figaro that “big changes are indispensable� But perhaps the French are just not up to the sacrifices that change imposes. The most commonly cited reason for the difficulty of reform, said a poll in Libération this week, is “the state of mind of the French� Yet an alternative explanation is that the case for change has never been well put. In 1995 Alain Juppé, prime minister and architect of a bold set of reforms, came across as an arrogant technocrat. He capitulated after paralysing winter strikes. This time, Mr de Villepin mistakenly chose to ram his CPE through by decree, with neither a full parliamentary debate nor any consultation with the unions. As an unelected former diplomat, he was perhaps not in an ideal position to bypass the people s elected representatives. His difficulty is that, had he consulted more widely, he might not have succeeded in getting the CPE through at all. His predecessor, Jean-Pierre Raffarin, spent so much time consulting that most of his proposals for reform ended up diluted. Even his 2003 pension reform, which was carefully negotiated with the unions, did not go far enough. By definition, consensus-seeking, which has long been Mr Chirac s overriding concern, is not easy to square with unpopular reform. After Mr de Villepin s tumble, Mr Sarkozy now looks the right s most likely candidate in the 2007 presidential election. But do